PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.01%
Net income growth above 1.5x AI's 0.92%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
1.21%
Less D&A growth vs. AI's 7.95%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
69.92%
Deferred tax of 69.92% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
3.77%
SBC growth well above AI's 5.85%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-43.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AI at -57.54%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
198.13%
AR growth well above AI's 32.17%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-235.03%
Negative yoy inventory while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-7.40%
Both negative yoy AP, with AI at -113.40%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-167.56%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AI at -123.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-68.18%
Both negative yoy, with AI at -170.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
6.30%
Some CFO growth while AI is negative at -85.45%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-10.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -19.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-247.80%
Negative yoy acquisition while AI stands at 250.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
29.36%
Some yoy expansion while AI is negative at -30.07%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
69.81%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x AI's 23.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-265.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -250.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
105.51%
We have mild expansions while AI is negative at -50.25%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-50.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
33.79%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. AI's 84.63%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
15.31%
We have some buyback growth while AI is negative at -234.96%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.