503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.89%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with AI at -8.42%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
51.98%
D&A growth well above AI's 3.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-199.65%
Negative yoy deferred tax while AI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
12.80%
SBC growth well above AI's 4.50%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-525.97%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AI at -269.23%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-126.74%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with AI at -271.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
391.88%
Some inventory rise while AI is negative at -134.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-307.66%
Both negative yoy AP, with AI at -317.38%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
32.42%
Growth well above AI's 57.89%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
1314.29%
Some yoy increase while AI is negative at -25.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-38.35%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with AI at -1334.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.84%
Lower CapEx growth vs. AI's 49.03%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-5383.05%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -16.67%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
49.67%
Purchases well above AI's 48.12%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-72.68%
Both yoy lines are negative, with AI at -35.36%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
237.17%
Growth well above AI's 16.67%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-14399.20%
We reduce yoy invests while AI stands at 85.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-94.40%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-61.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -41.40%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
17.20%
Buyback growth below 50% of AI's 63.92%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.