PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.32%
Some net income increase while AI is negative at -4.09%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.14%
Less D&A growth vs. AI's 2.69%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
22.27%
Deferred tax of 22.27% while AI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-4.42%
Negative yoy SBC while AI is 3.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
124.49%
Well above AI's 32.89% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
31.28%
AR growth while AI is negative at -47.32%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-82.36%
Negative yoy inventory while AI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
125.70%
AP growth well above AI's 13.89%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
157.79%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. AI's 506.82%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
7943.43%
Well above AI's 2038.22%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
69.29%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x AI's 19.63%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-12.50%
Negative yoy CapEx while AI is 6.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
97.58%
Some acquisitions while AI is negative at -914.80%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
48.73%
Some yoy expansion while AI is negative at -0.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-7.98%
We reduce yoy sales while AI is 9.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-195.10%
We reduce yoy other investing while AI is 914.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
85.12%
Investing outflow well above AI's 134.44%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-210.25%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
100.00%
We slightly raise equity while AI is negative at -78.37%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-5.33%
We cut yoy buybacks while AI is 72.31%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.