PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.44%
Some net income increase while AI is negative at -0.41%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.86%
D&A growth well above AI's 0.03%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
13.45%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. AI's 200.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-0.26%
Negative yoy SBC while AI is 3.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
184.85%
Well above AI's 201.86% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-553.16%
AR is negative yoy while AI is 243.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-78.85%
Negative yoy inventory while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
548.77%
A yoy AP increase while AI is negative at -291.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
344.01%
Some yoy usage while AI is negative at -223.12%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
53.75%
Some yoy increase while AI is negative at -77.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
16.54%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of AI's 110.27%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-26.67%
Negative yoy CapEx while AI is 58.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
14.79%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. AI's 173.00%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-29.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -1.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-32.34%
We reduce yoy sales while AI is 11.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
70.18%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. AI's 180.05%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-38.77%
We reduce yoy invests while AI stands at 534.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-54.86%
We cut debt repayment yoy while AI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
2.30%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. AI's 564.47%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
0.07%
We have some buyback growth while AI is negative at -297.05%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.