PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.94%
Net income growth at 75-90% of AI's 13.85%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
15.72%
Some D&A expansion while AI is negative at -4.03%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-25.15%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
5.04%
SBC growth while AI is negative at -3.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-88.08%
Both reduce yoy usage, with AI at -19.37%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
205.97%
AR growth while AI is negative at -123.12%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-778.18%
Negative yoy inventory while AI is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-121.79%
Negative yoy AP while AI is 352.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-173.54%
Negative yoy usage while AI is 146.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-100.51%
Both negative yoy, with AI at -118.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-8.11%
Negative yoy CFO while AI is 100.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-7.57%
Negative yoy CapEx while AI is 63.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-37.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
42.78%
Some yoy expansion while AI is negative at -35.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
14.64%
We have some liquidation growth while AI is negative at -4.37%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-139.01%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-2.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with AI at -259.90%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
52.09%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of AI's 97.13%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
32.21%
We slightly raise equity while AI is negative at -61.30%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
2.45%
We have some buyback growth while AI is negative at -4.32%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.