PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
7.12%
Net income growth under 50% of BB's 42.04%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
28.02%
D&A growth of 28.02% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-93.78%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BB stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.53%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BB at -14.29%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
117.68%
Well above BB's 139.12% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
58.83%
AR growth while BB is negative at -1049.21%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-92.69%
Negative yoy inventory while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
23.07%
Lower AP growth vs. BB's 199.67%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
145.18%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. BB's 307.05%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-130.53%
Both negative yoy, with BB at -1070.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
66.18%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of BB's 123.08%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-5.95%
Negative yoy CapEx while BB is 299.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
30.18%
Acquisition growth of 30.18% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-118.24%
Negative yoy purchasing while BB stands at 409.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
72.03%
We have some liquidation growth while BB is negative at -57.96%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
3875.00%
We have some outflow growth while BB is negative at -3667.94%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
9.91%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -82.93%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.28%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. BB's 84609.87%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
4.11%
Buyback growth of 4.11% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.