PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.83%
Some net income increase while BB is negative at -60.92%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.12%
Negative yoy D&A while BB is 18.56%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-167.19%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BB at -109.69%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-167.19%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BB at -109.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
392.94%
Some yoy increase while BB is negative at -28942440.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-16.76%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BB at -88.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-27.36%
Negative yoy CapEx while BB is 35.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.64%
Purchases growth of 34.64% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1759.09%
We reduce yoy other investing while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-9.40%
We reduce yoy invests while BB stands at 35.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.89%
Negative yoy issuance while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
46.83%
Buyback growth of 46.83% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.