PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.59%
Negative net income growth while BB stands at 192.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
102.09%
D&A growth well above BB's 15.47%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-6.96%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BB stands at 2240.46%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
180.11%
Slight usage while BB is negative at -9261.89%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
180.11%
Some yoy usage while BB is negative at -9261.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-106.09%
Negative yoy while BB is 204.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
39.91%
Some CFO growth while BB is negative at -4319.05%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
2.94%
Some CapEx rise while BB is negative at -157.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.21%
Negative yoy purchasing while BB stands at 18.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
67.56%
Below 50% of BB's 153.18%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-788.43%
We reduce yoy invests while BB stands at 240.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.05%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. BB's 77682.68%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
38.45%
Buyback growth of 38.45% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.