PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-40.74%
Negative net income growth while BB stands at 226.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-8.54%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BB at -62.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-16516.67%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BB stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
186.92%
Slight usage while BB is negative at -92.77%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.96%
Some yoy usage while BB is negative at -92.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-114.12%
Negative yoy while BB is 174.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
33.59%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x BB's 21.48%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-2.99%
Negative yoy CapEx while BB is 188.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
9.03%
Purchases growth of 9.03% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-2.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with BB at -198.80%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.00%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -373.92%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.81%
Negative yoy issuance while BB is 335.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
30.14%
Buyback growth of 30.14% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.