503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.11%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BB at -21.01%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-17.00%
Negative yoy D&A while BB is 509.54%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
105.48%
Deferred tax of 105.48% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-76.86%
Negative yoy SBC while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
586.33%
Slight usage while BB is negative at -5032.08%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
169.42%
AR growth of 169.42% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.85%
Some yoy usage while BB is negative at -5032.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-977.46%
Both negative yoy, with BB at -152.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
8.66%
Some CFO growth while BB is negative at -129.16%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-23.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -139.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.50%
Purchases growth of 12.50% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-7.50%
We reduce yoy sales while BB is 236.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.13%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -75.68%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
200.53%
Stock issuance far above BB's 288.54%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-120.27%
We cut yoy buybacks while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.