PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.11%
Negative net income growth while BB stands at 5052.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-17.02%
Negative yoy D&A while BB is 12.47%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
48.39%
Deferred tax of 48.39% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
124.26%
SBC growth of 124.26% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
144.23%
Slight usage while BB is negative at -123.21%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
403.45%
AR growth of 403.45% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.82%
Some yoy usage while BB is negative at -131.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-119.04%
Negative yoy while BB is 100.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
8.88%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BB's 1150.53%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
18.08%
Lower CapEx growth vs. BB's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
4.10%
Some acquisitions while BB is negative at -1918.16%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-109.91%
Negative yoy purchasing while BB stands at 87.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
56.70%
Below 50% of BB's 320.31%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-479.63%
We reduce yoy invests while BB stands at 173.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
161.19%
Stock issuance far above BB's 86.31%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
27.64%
Buyback growth of 27.64% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.