PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
87.59%
Net income growth under 50% of BB's 2708.07%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
21.92%
Less D&A growth vs. BB's 1536.60%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
289.75%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. BB's 580.29%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-26.54%
Negative yoy SBC while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
1010.55%
Slight usage while BB is negative at -173.31%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
149.41%
AR growth of 149.41% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1135.03%
Growth of 1135.03% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-1826.51%
Negative yoy while BB is 954.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
257.05%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x BB's 109.06%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
19.41%
Some CapEx rise while BB is negative at -1252.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
67.20%
Some acquisitions while BB is negative at -29.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
20.27%
Some yoy expansion while BB is negative at -338.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-9.36%
We reduce yoy sales while BB is 338.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
134.12%
Growth well above BB's 149.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
126.10%
Investing outflow well above BB's 28.87%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.38%
Negative yoy issuance while BB is 745.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-18.65%
We cut yoy buybacks while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.