PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
41.32%
Net income growth above 1.5x BB's 20.86%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
14.17%
D&A growth well above BB's 10.12%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
270.81%
Some yoy growth while BB is negative at -252.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
127.43%
SBC growth of 127.43% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
112.26%
Well above BB's 73.63% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
377.55%
AR growth of 377.55% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.81%
Growth well above BB's 57.93%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-108.54%
Negative yoy while BB is 419.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
33.53%
Operating cash flow growth similar to BB's 33.54%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
37.80%
CapEx growth well above BB's 13.01%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-732.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -64.04%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
15.46%
Some yoy expansion while BB is negative at -159.66%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-4.81%
We reduce yoy sales while BB is 123.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
167.59%
Growth of 167.59% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-309.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -67.72%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.50%
We slightly raise equity while BB is negative at -26.58%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
59.40%
We have some buyback growth while BB is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.