PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.78%
Negative net income growth while BB stands at 29.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
10.60%
D&A growth well above BB's 16.75%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-68.11%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BB stands at 110.83%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
3.61%
SBC growth of 3.61% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
182.16%
Well above BB's 181.32% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
171.81%
AR growth of 171.81% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.43%
Negative yoy usage while BB is 314.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-119.24%
Negative yoy while BB is 17.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
55.07%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BB's 132.75%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-9.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -49.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
68.13%
Acquisition growth of 68.13% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
44.89%
Some yoy expansion while BB is negative at -50.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-54.07%
We reduce yoy sales while BB is 44.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
140.13%
Growth well above BB's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
25.83%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -67.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.52%
Negative yoy issuance while BB is 20.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
69.44%
Buyback growth of 69.44% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.