PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.07%
Negative net income growth while BB stands at 11.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
14.29%
D&A growth well above BB's 6.05%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
47.57%
Some yoy growth while BB is negative at -574.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-385.79%
Negative yoy SBC while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-307.68%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BB is 117.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-211.85%
AR is negative yoy while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22994.12%
Negative yoy usage while BB is 94.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
968.62%
Some yoy increase while BB is negative at -403.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-42.32%
Negative yoy CFO while BB is 16.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-60.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -205.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-1411.59%
Negative yoy acquisition while BB stands at 99.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-48.20%
Negative yoy purchasing while BB stands at 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
137.68%
We have some liquidation growth while BB is negative at -30.61%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-55.34%
We reduce yoy other investing while BB is 98.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
35.35%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -222.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1312.31%
Negative yoy issuance while BB is 12.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-247.26%
We cut yoy buybacks while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.