PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-39.87%
Negative net income growth while BB stands at 32.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
12.85%
D&A growth well above BB's 17.76%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-143.82%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-0.82%
Negative yoy SBC while BB is 22.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
402.45%
Well above BB's 321.56% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
169.81%
AR growth of 169.81% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-30.43%
Negative yoy usage while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
83.77%
Some yoy increase while BB is negative at -69.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
48.78%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of BB's 83.70%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-8.51%
Negative yoy CapEx while BB is 30.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-126.98%
Negative yoy acquisition while BB stands at 2108.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-161.65%
Negative yoy purchasing while BB stands at 9.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
11.55%
Below 50% of BB's 151.35%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-6317.39%
We reduce yoy invests while BB stands at 92.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
18.80%
Debt repayment growth of 18.80% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
339.58%
We slightly raise equity while BB is negative at -20.63%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
47.69%
We have some buyback growth while BB is negative at -15019.85%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.