PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.62%
Net income growth above 1.5x BB's 3.62%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-4.47%
Negative yoy D&A while BB is 11.84%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
20.95%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. BB's 203.09%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
4.73%
SBC growth well above BB's 5.61%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-204.59%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BB at -178.41%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-189.00%
AR is negative yoy while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
181.20%
Inventory growth of 181.20% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
154.00%
AP growth of 154.00% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-117.28%
Negative yoy usage while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
31.33%
Some yoy increase while BB is negative at -191.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-48.91%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BB at -19.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
12.94%
Some CapEx rise while BB is negative at -16.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
90.51%
Some acquisitions while BB is negative at -2159.89%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
20.51%
Purchases well above BB's 35.54%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
61.57%
Below 50% of BB's 167.87%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-38.51%
We reduce yoy other investing while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
68.33%
Investing outflow well above BB's 77.07%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-22.85%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
272.88%
We slightly raise equity while BB is negative at -50.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-14.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -271.36%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.