PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.27%
Net income growth above 1.5x BB's 2.54%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-4.31%
Negative yoy D&A while BB is 39.78%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
652.54%
Well above BB's 192.33% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
0.55%
Less SBC growth vs. BB's 3.37%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-303.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BB at -37.08%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-261.20%
AR is negative yoy while BB is 116.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-78.24%
Negative yoy inventory while BB is 281.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
674.51%
A yoy AP increase while BB is negative at -215.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-2062.86%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BB at -123.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
875.05%
Some yoy increase while BB is negative at -197.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-31.48%
Negative yoy CFO while BB is 3.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
2.43%
Some CapEx rise while BB is negative at -92.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
98.60%
Some acquisitions while BB is negative at -454.22%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
42.43%
Purchases well above BB's 60.17%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
12.70%
1.25-1.5x BB's 11.18%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
-3421.88%
We reduce yoy other investing while BB is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
86.69%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -35.31%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-975.27%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-260.21%
Negative yoy issuance while BB is 895.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-48.11%
We cut yoy buybacks while BB is 90.36%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.