PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.32%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BB at -25.61%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5.37%
Less D&A growth vs. BB's 14.34%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
23.31%
Some yoy growth while BB is negative at -98.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
2.57%
Less SBC growth vs. BB's 15.40%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
147.46%
Well above BB's 74.93% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
196.87%
AR growth well above BB's 25.04%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-203.63%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with BB at -633.98%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-250.85%
Negative yoy AP while BB is 169.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
9.11%
Some yoy usage while BB is negative at -242.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-138.78%
Negative yoy while BB is 210.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
42.93%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x BB's 1.54%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
32.09%
Some CapEx rise while BB is negative at -16.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-43650.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while BB stands at 83.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-36.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -0.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
14.57%
We have some liquidation growth while BB is negative at -32.54%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
93.79%
Growth of 93.79% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-143.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -11.13%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
114.93%
We slightly raise equity while BB is negative at -85.99%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-53.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -57.75%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.