PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-109.63%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BB at -147.17%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
4.05%
Some D&A expansion while BB is negative at -8.47%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
601.49%
Well above BB's 16.67% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-12.01%
Negative yoy SBC while BB is 36.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-17.51%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BB is 145.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-280.76%
AR is negative yoy while BB is 345.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
626.00%
Some inventory rise while BB is negative at -131.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
406.14%
A yoy AP increase while BB is negative at -2.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
56.17%
Some yoy usage while BB is negative at -123.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
59.93%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. BB's 1917.65%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-19.98%
Negative yoy CFO while BB is 17.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
16.96%
Some CapEx rise while BB is negative at -112.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-526.19%
Negative yoy acquisition while BB stands at 1182.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
50.09%
Some yoy expansion while BB is negative at -1018.52%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-27.47%
Both yoy lines are negative, with BB at -53.33%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-209.97%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -25900.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
61.91%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -32.72%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-249.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-0.68%
We cut yoy buybacks while BB is 94.69%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.