PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.62%
Some net income increase while BB is negative at -185.71%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.95%
Negative yoy D&A while BB is 1.27%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
195.51%
Some yoy growth while BB is negative at -105.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
5.66%
SBC growth while BB is negative at -13.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-0.07%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BB is 166.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
216.78%
AR growth while BB is negative at -2.23%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-456.68%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with BB at -94.52%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-156.79%
Both negative yoy AP, with BB at -73.88%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-67.74%
Negative yoy usage while BB is 228.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
10.90%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. BB's 127.27%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
39.00%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BB's 200.00%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
31.38%
Some CapEx rise while BB is negative at -29.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
25.00%
Some acquisitions while BB is negative at -115.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
45.35%
Some yoy expansion while BB is negative at -22.98%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-49.98%
We reduce yoy sales while BB is 71.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-179.01%
We reduce yoy other investing while BB is 4.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
20.98%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -0.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
25.71%
Debt repayment growth of 25.71% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
22.29%
Issuance growth of 22.29% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-109.98%
We cut yoy buybacks while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.