PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
25.06%
Some net income increase while BB is negative at -1048.81%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
32.18%
Some D&A expansion while BB is negative at -10.53%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-143.56%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-6.93%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BB at -10.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-37.44%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BB is 65.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-173.67%
AR is negative yoy while BB is 533.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
254.27%
Inventory growth well above BB's 80.99%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
318.12%
A yoy AP increase while BB is negative at -137.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
96.22%
Some yoy usage while BB is negative at -137.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-7.78%
Both negative yoy, with BB at -44.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-46.22%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BB at -122.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-40.70%
Negative yoy CapEx while BB is 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-826.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while BB stands at 3928.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
11.12%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. BB's 73.53%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
20.42%
We have some liquidation growth while BB is negative at -51.01%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
360.94%
Growth well above BB's 41.87%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
77.79%
Investing outflow well above BB's 56.30%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
41.20%
Debt repayment growth of 41.20% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-42.36%
Negative yoy issuance while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
3.43%
Buyback growth of 3.43% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.