PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.56%
Negative net income growth while BB stands at 105.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-18.03%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BB at -5.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
181.57%
Well above BB's 178.13% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
4.53%
SBC growth while BB is negative at -22.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-13.53%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BB is 129.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
223.57%
AR growth while BB is negative at -15.93%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-142.71%
Negative yoy inventory while BB is 1270.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-176.36%
Negative yoy AP while BB is 22.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-63.29%
Negative yoy usage while BB is 109.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
4.21%
Some yoy increase while BB is negative at -141.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-12.19%
Negative yoy CFO while BB is 153.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
3.61%
Lower CapEx growth vs. BB's 41.05%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
97.49%
Some acquisitions while BB is negative at -41.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-2.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -88.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-16.63%
We reduce yoy sales while BB is 108.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-55.51%
We reduce yoy other investing while BB is 177.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
13.16%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. BB's 73.62%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
25.00%
Debt repayment well below BB's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
47.95%
Issuance growth of 47.95% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-146.84%
We cut yoy buybacks while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.