PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
29.14%
Some net income increase while BB is negative at -1000.00%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.51%
Some D&A expansion while BB is negative at -10.47%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
4.32%
Some yoy growth while BB is negative at -60.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-2.01%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BB at -42.86%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-38.50%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BB at -123.42%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-150.97%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with BB at -61.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
321.53%
Some inventory rise while BB is negative at -104.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
120.79%
AP growth well above BB's 79.34%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
40.20%
Some yoy usage while BB is negative at -225.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-5.46%
Negative yoy while BB is 206.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-48.05%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BB at -61.92%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-16.22%
Negative yoy CapEx while BB is 13.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-1881.56%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -106.34%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
20.42%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. BB's 58.90%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
1.98%
We have some liquidation growth while BB is negative at -71.85%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
164.85%
We have some outflow growth while BB is negative at -62.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
39.05%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -183.81%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-219.87%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-43.98%
Negative yoy issuance while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
25.73%
Buyback growth of 25.73% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.