PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-164.09%
Negative net income growth while BB stands at 118.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.45%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BB at -4.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-354.55%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BB stands at 25.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
2.03%
SBC growth of 2.03% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-4.39%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BB at -384.21%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-249.06%
AR is negative yoy while BB is 218.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
0.23%
Some inventory rise while BB is negative at -272.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
63.59%
Lower AP growth vs. BB's 1500.00%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
77.69%
Some yoy usage while BB is negative at -204.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
61.29%
Some yoy increase while BB is negative at -47.13%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-28.78%
Negative yoy CFO while BB is 12.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-28.04%
Negative yoy CapEx while BB is 66.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-286.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -154.84%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
16.41%
Some yoy expansion while BB is negative at -116.48%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-15.11%
We reduce yoy sales while BB is 66.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
99.10%
We have some outflow growth while BB is negative at -190.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
7.55%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -156.48%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
50.43%
Debt repayment growth of 50.43% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
3.42%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. BB's 2950.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
16.60%
Buyback growth of 16.60% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.