PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
244.60%
Net income growth above 1.5x BB's 142.86%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-2.14%
Negative yoy D&A while BB is 1.23%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
111.34%
Some yoy growth while BB is negative at -86.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
3.06%
SBC growth of 3.06% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
3.28%
Less working capital growth vs. BB's 116.30%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
217.03%
AR growth while BB is negative at -70.34%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-118.41%
Negative yoy inventory while BB is 42.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
4.93%
A yoy AP increase while BB is negative at -637.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-57.68%
Negative yoy usage while BB is 137.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-163.86%
Both negative yoy, with BB at -255.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
26.09%
Some CFO growth while BB is negative at -36.19%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
23.86%
Lower CapEx growth vs. BB's 55.10%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
37.70%
Acquisition spending well above BB's 32.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-48.74%
Negative yoy purchasing while BB stands at 58.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
51.26%
We have some liquidation growth while BB is negative at -53.12%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
2166.67%
Growth well above BB's 71.90%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
0.02%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. BB's 65.16%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
46.30%
Debt repayment growth of 46.30% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
45.03%
We slightly raise equity while BB is negative at -98.36%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-11.17%
We cut yoy buybacks while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.