PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-16.88%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BB at -167.42%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
11.89%
Some D&A expansion while BB is negative at -21.60%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-278.06%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BB stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.19%
Negative yoy SBC while BB is 28.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
1.12%
Less working capital growth vs. BB's 169.05%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-365.56%
AR is negative yoy while BB is 347.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-20.33%
Negative yoy inventory while BB is 150.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
86.82%
A yoy AP increase while BB is negative at -98.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
62.24%
Growth well above BB's 80.26%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-5.50%
Both negative yoy, with BB at -883.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-18.36%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BB at -1246.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-15.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -112.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
88.73%
Acquisition spending well above BB's 98.58%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-10.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while BB stands at 12.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-7.95%
Both yoy lines are negative, with BB at -45.09%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-18.18%
We reduce yoy other investing while BB is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-83.71%
We reduce yoy invests while BB stands at 60.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
97.22%
Debt repayment growth of 97.22% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
8.81%
We slightly raise equity while BB is negative at -50.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
4.67%
We have some buyback growth while BB is negative at -260.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.