PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.87%
Net income growth under 50% of BB's 44.48%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
19.27%
Some D&A expansion while BB is negative at -20.83%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-4013.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BB stands at 284.38%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.10%
Less SBC growth vs. BB's 50.00%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-25.63%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BB is 251.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-137.79%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with BB at -41.10%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
230.57%
Inventory growth well above BB's 437.50%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
122.35%
A yoy AP increase while BB is negative at -725.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
24.39%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. BB's 89.26%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-8.19%
Both negative yoy, with BB at -88.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-45.51%
Negative yoy CFO while BB is 47.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
8.09%
CapEx growth of 8.09% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
-103066.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while BB stands at 66.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
18.20%
Purchases well above BB's 20.11%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
40.80%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x BB's 4.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
1373.81%
We have some outflow growth while BB is negative at -40.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
20.14%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. BB's 46.49%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-1730.22%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-45.64%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
17.49%
Buyback growth of 17.49% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.