PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.67%
Negative net income growth while BB stands at 68.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
13.25%
Some D&A expansion while BB is negative at -7.02%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-32.37%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
15.12%
SBC growth while BB is negative at -16.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
44.37%
Slight usage while BB is negative at -291.14%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
154.85%
AR growth while BB is negative at -46.51%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-101.41%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with BB at -103.49%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-529.29%
Both negative yoy AP, with BB at -158.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
22.45%
Some yoy usage while BB is negative at -162.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-8.63%
Both negative yoy, with BB at -93.65%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
69.39%
Some CFO growth while BB is negative at -365.63%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
14.74%
Some CapEx rise while BB is negative at -23.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
96.76%
Acquisition growth of 96.76% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
6.11%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. BB's 23.58%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-28.42%
Both yoy lines are negative, with BB at -63.83%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-200.93%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -11.11%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
58.03%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -101.20%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
94.88%
Debt repayment growth of 94.88% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
36.64%
Issuance growth of 36.64% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
42.71%
Buyback growth of 42.71% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.