PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.97%
Net income growth under 50% of BB's 1527.66%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
6.66%
Some D&A expansion while BB is negative at -10.53%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
97.28%
Some yoy growth while BB is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
6.57%
SBC growth while BB is negative at -13.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-85.12%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BB at -533.33%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
215.62%
AR growth well above BB's 61.11%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-414.07%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with BB at -16.67%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-147.88%
Both negative yoy AP, with BB at -1475.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-113.57%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BB at -321.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
96.88%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. BB's 855.17%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
13.04%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BB's 4694.44%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
6.61%
Lower CapEx growth vs. BB's 62.96%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
50.00%
Some acquisitions while BB is negative at -70.83%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-13.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -123.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
15.80%
At 50-75% of BB's 27.27%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage if competitor monetizes investments more efficiently.
202.91%
We have some outflow growth while BB is negative at -110.17%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
6.31%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -493.81%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
65.29%
Debt repayment growth of 65.29% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
38.91%
Issuance growth of 38.91% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-45.61%
We cut yoy buybacks while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.