PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-195.83%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BB at -97.17%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.48%
Some D&A expansion while BB is negative at -11.76%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
25890.57%
Deferred tax of 25890.57% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
1.34%
SBC growth while BB is negative at -15.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-178.50%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BB is 121.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-149.16%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with BB at -44.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
217.79%
Some inventory rise while BB is negative at -80.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
330.47%
AP growth well above BB's 121.82%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
84.09%
Growth well above BB's 86.25%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-30.78%
Both negative yoy, with BB at -140.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-36.70%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BB at -99.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-21.29%
Negative yoy CapEx while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
84.92%
Acquisition growth of 84.92% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-36.99%
Negative yoy purchasing while BB stands at 34.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
68.47%
We have some liquidation growth while BB is negative at -6.08%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-266.98%
We reduce yoy other investing while BB is 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
95.21%
Investing outflow well above BB's 50.67%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-184.60%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-38.44%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
21.87%
Buyback growth of 21.87% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.