PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
217.80%
Some net income increase while BB is negative at -1547.37%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.86%
Some D&A expansion while BB is negative at -6.67%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-98.18%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BB stands at 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.72%
Negative yoy SBC while BB is 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
153.09%
Less working capital growth vs. BB's 575.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
132.88%
AR growth while BB is negative at -156.25%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-106.22%
Negative yoy inventory while BB is 66.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-141.90%
Both negative yoy AP, with BB at -283.33%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
174.34%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. BB's 1563.64%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
35.96%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. BB's 196.63%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
54.30%
Some CFO growth while BB is negative at -125.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-13.46%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -30.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-818.52%
Negative yoy acquisition while BB stands at 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
40.46%
Some yoy expansion while BB is negative at -51.03%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-28.74%
We reduce yoy sales while BB is 173.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
89.27%
We have some outflow growth while BB is negative at -60.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
1261.33%
Investing outflow well above BB's 79.76%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-46.77%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
32.80%
Issuance growth of 32.80% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-88.30%
We cut yoy buybacks while BB is 94.12%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.