PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.52%
Net income growth under 50% of BB's 96.36%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-7.16%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BB at -7.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-696.79%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
4.44%
SBC growth well above BB's 8.33%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-13.50%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BB at -230.37%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-815.02%
AR is negative yoy while BB is 244.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-662.67%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with BB at -3640.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
357.00%
AP growth well above BB's 22.73%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
2238.10%
Some yoy usage while BB is negative at -96.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-29.45%
Both negative yoy, with BB at -127.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-6.03%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BB at -16100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-35.65%
Negative yoy CapEx while BB is 7.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-75.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while BB stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-20.44%
Negative yoy purchasing while BB stands at 23.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
0.60%
Below 50% of BB's 27.32%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
57.89%
Growth of 57.89% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-169.46%
We reduce yoy invests while BB stands at 755.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
86.05%
Debt repayment growth of 86.05% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1.59%
We slightly raise equity while BB is negative at -75.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
37.53%
Buyback growth below 50% of BB's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.