PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.09%
Some net income increase while BB is negative at -25.71%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
7.81%
D&A growth well above BB's 1.89%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
85.08%
Some yoy growth while BB is negative at -150.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
6.18%
SBC growth while BB is negative at -17.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-298.63%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BB is 140.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-141.66%
AR is negative yoy while BB is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
242.42%
Inventory growth well above BB's 148.53%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
98.72%
A yoy AP increase while BB is negative at -1300.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
79.10%
Some yoy usage while BB is negative at -185.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-1945.45%
Both negative yoy, with BB at -9.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-22.71%
Negative yoy CFO while BB is 126.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-4.73%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -44.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
82.68%
Some acquisitions while BB is negative at -150.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
18.72%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. BB's 58.93%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-34.80%
Both yoy lines are negative, with BB at -2.96%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-216.42%
We reduce yoy other investing while BB is 171.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-239.86%
We reduce yoy invests while BB stands at 167.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.28%
Debt repayment growth of 99.28% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-45.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
-5.99%
We cut yoy buybacks while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.