PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.70%
Negative net income growth while BB stands at 27.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.65%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BB at -1.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
206.68%
Deferred tax of 206.68% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-0.15%
Negative yoy SBC while BB is 7.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
135.21%
Slight usage while BB is negative at -25.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
121.20%
AR growth while BB is negative at -43.33%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-77.35%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with BB at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
7900.00%
AP growth well above BB's 16.67%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
104.88%
Growth well above BB's 69.57%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
125.62%
Well above BB's 50.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
63.90%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BB's 129.41%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-6.26%
Negative yoy CapEx while BB is 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-311.25%
Negative yoy acquisition while BB stands at 900.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
16.31%
Some yoy expansion while BB is negative at -72.05%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
20.83%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x BB's 13.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
272.00%
We have some outflow growth while BB is negative at -108.70%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
100.84%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -88.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-16566.67%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
46.15%
Issuance growth of 46.15% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-35.59%
We cut yoy buybacks while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.