PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.19%
Some net income increase while BB is negative at -28.13%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
12.38%
Some D&A expansion while BB is negative at -1.89%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-125.40%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BB stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.82%
Less SBC growth vs. BB's 13.33%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
68.49%
Slight usage while BB is negative at -147.62%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-1149.94%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with BB at -94.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-238.67%
Negative yoy inventory while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
454.21%
AP growth well above BB's 140.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
13958.21%
Some yoy usage while BB is negative at -114.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-251.92%
Negative yoy while BB is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
6.68%
Some CFO growth while BB is negative at -12.82%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-25.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-401.52%
Negative yoy acquisition while BB stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-18.66%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -26.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
9.95%
We have some liquidation growth while BB is negative at -30.87%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-129.93%
We reduce yoy other investing while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-8849.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -1660.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-0.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -80.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
17.96%
Buyback growth of 17.96% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.