PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.48%
Some net income increase while BB is negative at -142.31%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.90%
D&A growth of 13.90% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
61.36%
Deferred tax of 61.36% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
3.02%
SBC growth of 3.02% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-33.81%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BB is 250.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-4102.07%
AR is negative yoy while BB is 7.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-17.93%
Negative yoy inventory while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
94.12%
AP growth of 94.12% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
538.20%
Growth well above BB's 110.00%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-18.52%
Negative yoy while BB is 206.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
2.39%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BB's 73.33%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-26.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -77.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
93.33%
Acquisition spending well above BB's 85.71%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
19.04%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. BB's 39.33%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-49.54%
We reduce yoy sales while BB is 243.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
8.50%
We have some outflow growth while BB is negative at -428.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-12.07%
We reduce yoy invests while BB stands at 70.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x BB's 0.16%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
13.64%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. BB's 125.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-3.56%
We cut yoy buybacks while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.