PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-8.49%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BB at -132.26%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
8.84%
Some D&A expansion while BB is negative at -2.04%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
103.07%
Deferred tax of 103.07% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
11.46%
Less SBC growth vs. BB's 42.86%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-275.14%
Negative yoy working capital usage while BB is 323.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-152.86%
AR is negative yoy while BB is 10.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
150.71%
Inventory growth well above BB's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
149.89%
A yoy AP increase while BB is negative at -99.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-22.65%
Negative yoy usage while BB is 120.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
15.66%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. BB's 730.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-40.99%
Negative yoy CFO while BB is 145.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-0.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -25.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
29.52%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. BB's 233.33%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
75.70%
Some yoy expansion while BB is negative at -5.74%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-43.78%
Both yoy lines are negative, with BB at -54.47%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
78.66%
We have some outflow growth while BB is negative at -126.67%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
64.28%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -135.80%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-52.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -75.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
3.27%
Buyback growth of 3.27% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.