PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.07%
Net income growth under 50% of BB's 94.59%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
5.46%
Some D&A expansion while BB is negative at -24.44%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
242.93%
Well above BB's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
4.77%
Less SBC growth vs. BB's 37.50%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-52.05%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BB at -22.22%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1574.21%
AR is negative yoy while BB is 54.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-65.23%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with BB at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
411.35%
A yoy AP increase while BB is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
485.36%
Growth well above BB's 22.22%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
13722.86%
Some yoy increase while BB is negative at -46.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-2.98%
Negative yoy CFO while BB is 147.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-28.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -10.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
93.25%
Acquisition spending well above BB's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
43.61%
Purchases well above BB's 16.92%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-74.92%
We reduce yoy sales while BB is 51.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3.64%
We have some outflow growth while BB is negative at -181.40%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
39.84%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. BB's 4900.00%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-3.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -75.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
0.74%
Buyback growth of 0.74% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.