PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.87%
Some net income increase while BB is negative at -225.69%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-29.88%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BB at -14.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-520.85%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BB stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.76%
SBC growth while BB is negative at -27.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
27.16%
Less working capital growth vs. BB's 1472.73%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
192.84%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. BB's 564.83%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-17.79%
Negative yoy inventory while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-158.93%
Both negative yoy AP, with BB at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-125.20%
Negative yoy usage while BB is 1857.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-139.22%
Negative yoy while BB is 71.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-5.81%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BB at -566.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
8.56%
Lower CapEx growth vs. BB's 18.18%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
72.37%
Acquisition growth of 72.37% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-1.91%
Negative yoy purchasing while BB stands at 25.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
110.06%
We have some liquidation growth while BB is negative at -37.74%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
24.43%
We have some outflow growth while BB is negative at -394.29%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
67.81%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -44.79%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.73%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. BB's 200.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
36.36%
Buyback growth of 36.36% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.