PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.44%
Negative net income growth while BB stands at 70.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
30.75%
Some D&A expansion while BB is negative at -3.45%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-9.57%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BB stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
15.78%
SBC growth while BB is negative at -12.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-652.43%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BB at -93.38%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-126.98%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with BB at -94.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
340.33%
Inventory growth of 340.33% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-31.33%
Negative yoy AP while BB is 175.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-120.81%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BB at -98.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
103.76%
Well above BB's 69.39%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-51.84%
Negative yoy CFO while BB is 42.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
0.14%
Some CapEx rise while BB is negative at -22.22%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-94.56%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -90.42%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-131.38%
Negative yoy purchasing while BB stands at 32.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
24.86%
We have some liquidation growth while BB is negative at -25.22%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
65.00%
Growth well above BB's 100.25%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-128.29%
We reduce yoy invests while BB stands at 20.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
25.00%
Debt repayment growth of 25.00% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-57.74%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -99.33%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
2.05%
Buyback growth of 2.05% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.