PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.41%
Net income growth under 50% of BB's 92.59%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.71%
Negative yoy D&A while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-28.35%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BB stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-2.88%
Negative yoy SBC while BB is 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
117.81%
Slight usage while BB is negative at -1740.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
55.50%
AR growth while BB is negative at -1150.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-91.88%
Negative yoy inventory while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
80.22%
A yoy AP increase while BB is negative at -83.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
155.24%
Some yoy usage while BB is negative at -7300.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-118.69%
Both negative yoy, with BB at -266.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
118.75%
Some CFO growth while BB is negative at -679.17%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-5.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while BB is 90.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
55.67%
Some acquisitions while BB is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
21.86%
Some yoy expansion while BB is negative at -8.11%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
22.99%
We have some liquidation growth while BB is negative at -18.34%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-460.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -1945.28%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
54.35%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -85.94%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
120.58%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. BB's 14838.01%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-0.92%
We cut yoy buybacks while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.