PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.01%
Net income growth under 50% of BB's 97.78%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.21%
Some D&A expansion while BB is negative at -20.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
69.92%
Deferred tax of 69.92% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
3.77%
SBC growth while BB is negative at -18.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-43.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BB at -930.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
198.13%
AR growth while BB is negative at -72.73%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-235.03%
Negative yoy inventory while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-7.40%
Both negative yoy AP, with BB at -200.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-167.56%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BB at -200.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-68.18%
Both negative yoy, with BB at -62.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
6.30%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BB's 1090.00%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-10.89%
Negative yoy CapEx while BB is 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-247.80%
Negative yoy acquisition while BB stands at 4525.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
29.36%
Purchases well above BB's 45.08%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
69.81%
We have some liquidation growth while BB is negative at -78.80%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-265.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -4525.88%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
105.51%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -176.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-50.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
33.79%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. BB's 3176.70%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
15.31%
Buyback growth of 15.31% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.