PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.32%
Net income growth under 50% of BB's 50.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.14%
Some D&A expansion while BB is negative at -12.50%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
22.27%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. BB's 900.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-4.42%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BB at -27.27%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
124.49%
Well above BB's 15.63% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
31.28%
AR growth while BB is negative at -460.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-82.36%
Negative yoy inventory while BB is 309.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
125.70%
AP growth well above BB's 66.67%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
157.79%
Growth well above BB's 187.50%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
7943.43%
Some yoy increase while BB is negative at -50.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
69.29%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x BB's 44.64%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-12.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -33.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
97.58%
Acquisition growth of 97.58% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
48.73%
Purchases well above BB's 96.15%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-7.98%
Both yoy lines are negative, with BB at -71.33%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-195.10%
We reduce yoy other investing while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
85.12%
We have mild expansions while BB is negative at -68.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-210.25%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
100.00%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. BB's 11354.29%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-5.33%
We cut yoy buybacks while BB is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.