PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.44%
Some net income increase while BB is negative at -164.03%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
5.86%
Some D&A expansion while BB is negative at -8.06%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
13.45%
Some yoy growth while BB is negative at -685.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.26%
Both cut yoy SBC, with BB at -37.50%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
184.85%
Well above BB's 52.56% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-553.16%
AR is negative yoy while BB is 50.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-78.85%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with BB at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
548.77%
AP growth well above BB's 100.56%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
344.01%
Growth well above BB's 113.85%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
53.75%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. BB's 726.55%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
16.54%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BB's 51.87%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-26.67%
Negative yoy CapEx while BB is 0.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
14.79%
Some acquisitions while BB is negative at -700.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-29.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -6055.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-32.34%
Both yoy lines are negative, with BB at -100.44%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
70.18%
Growth well above BB's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-38.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with BB at -282.48%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-54.86%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BB is 79.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
2.30%
Issuance growth of 2.30% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
0.07%
Buyback growth of 0.07% while BB is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.