PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.28%
Some net income increase while CORZ is negative at -261.32%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
2.56%
Some D&A expansion while CORZ is negative at -4.12%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
181.52%
Deferred tax of 181.52% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-3.70%
Negative yoy SBC while CORZ is 49.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-200.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while CORZ is 503.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-207.25%
AR is negative yoy while CORZ is 382766.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-186.45%
Negative yoy usage while CORZ is 156.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
853.38%
Well above CORZ's 221.96%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-36.45%
Negative yoy CFO while CORZ is 183.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-37.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -37.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.10%
Negative yoy purchasing while CORZ stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
93.92%
Liquidation growth of 93.92% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-143.38%
We reduce yoy other investing while CORZ is 4741.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-30.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -27.98%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-375000.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -21.02%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
25.44%
Stock issuance far above CORZ's 36.84%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-22.22%
We cut yoy buybacks while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.