503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.05%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with CORZ at -261.32%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
4.36%
Some D&A expansion while CORZ is negative at -4.12%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
61.43%
Deferred tax of 61.43% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-0.66%
Negative yoy SBC while CORZ is 49.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
88.04%
Less working capital growth vs. CORZ's 503.41%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
148.82%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. CORZ's 382766.67%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-1363.64%
Negative yoy inventory while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-109.78%
Negative yoy AP while CORZ is 85.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
7.23%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. CORZ's 156.60%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-11.34%
Negative yoy while CORZ is 221.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
102.22%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of CORZ's 183.75%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.27%
Acquisition growth of 65.27% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-80.27%
Negative yoy purchasing while CORZ stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
20.63%
Liquidation growth of 20.63% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
238.17%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. CORZ's 4741.67%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-195.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -27.98%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while CORZ is negative at -21.02%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
40.00%
Stock issuance far above CORZ's 36.84%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
38.00%
Buyback growth of 38.00% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.