PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
25.06%
Some net income increase while CORZ is negative at -261.32%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
32.18%
Some D&A expansion while CORZ is negative at -4.12%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-143.56%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CORZ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-6.93%
Negative yoy SBC while CORZ is 49.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-37.44%
Negative yoy working capital usage while CORZ is 503.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-173.67%
AR is negative yoy while CORZ is 382766.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
254.27%
Inventory growth of 254.27% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
318.12%
AP growth well above CORZ's 85.42%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
96.22%
Growth well above CORZ's 156.60%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-7.78%
Negative yoy while CORZ is 221.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-46.22%
Negative yoy CFO while CORZ is 183.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-40.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -37.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-826.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while CORZ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
11.12%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. CORZ's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
20.42%
Liquidation growth of 20.42% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
360.94%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. CORZ's 4741.67%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
77.79%
We have mild expansions while CORZ is negative at -27.98%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
41.20%
We repay more while CORZ is negative at -21.02%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-42.36%
Negative yoy issuance while CORZ is 36.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
3.43%
Buyback growth of 3.43% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.