PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.52%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with CORZ at -261.32%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
38.80%
Some D&A expansion while CORZ is negative at -4.12%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-94.21%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CORZ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
2.66%
Less SBC growth vs. CORZ's 49.34%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
11.69%
Less working capital growth vs. CORZ's 503.41%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-314.43%
AR is negative yoy while CORZ is 382766.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
38.58%
Inventory growth of 38.58% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
220.53%
AP growth well above CORZ's 85.42%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
66.68%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. CORZ's 156.60%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-13.50%
Negative yoy while CORZ is 221.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-5.79%
Negative yoy CFO while CORZ is 183.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-11.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -37.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-3483.44%
Negative yoy acquisition while CORZ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-10.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while CORZ stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
18.61%
Liquidation growth of 18.61% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-613.04%
We reduce yoy other investing while CORZ is 4741.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-107.98%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -27.98%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-566.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -21.02%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
3.55%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. CORZ's 36.84%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
36.59%
Buyback growth of 36.59% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.