503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.98%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with CORZ at -261.32%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-0.39%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with CORZ at -4.12%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-19.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CORZ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
1.26%
Less SBC growth vs. CORZ's 49.34%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
74.83%
Less working capital growth vs. CORZ's 503.41%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
208.20%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. CORZ's 382766.67%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-140.19%
Negative yoy inventory while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-384.67%
Negative yoy AP while CORZ is 85.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
7.70%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. CORZ's 156.60%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
3.43%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. CORZ's 221.96%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
120.51%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of CORZ's 183.75%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
6.64%
Some CapEx rise while CORZ is negative at -37.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
94.20%
Acquisition growth of 94.20% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-57.66%
Negative yoy purchasing while CORZ stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
43.94%
Liquidation growth of 43.94% while CORZ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-240.34%
We reduce yoy other investing while CORZ is 4741.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-16.22%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -27.98%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-37.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with CORZ at -21.02%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
20.66%
Stock issuance far above CORZ's 36.84%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
-139.21%
We cut yoy buybacks while CORZ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.